PT
ESWho compares
choose Phormanto™
Comparison of the packaging solutions for chilled chicken available in the market.
Ease of technical recycling
2 materials with the possibility of separation
Current
More than 2 materials without the possibility of separation
Thermosealed/ Thermoformed
with modified atmosphere
More than 2 materials without the possibility of separation
Thermosealed
monomaterial*
Phormanto™
*Taking Dow’s polyethylene formulation into consideration
Carbon emission
via Savvy Pack
Current
Thermosealed/ Thermoformed
with modified atmosphere
Thermosealed
Phormanto™
Amount of package per packaged product*
via Savvy Pack
Current
Thermosealed/ Thermoformed
with modified atmosphere
Thermosealed
Phormanto™
* Same packaging dimensions considered for the same amount of product
Cost per package
Current
Thermosealed/ Thermoformed
with modified atmosphere
Thermosealed
Phormanto™
Hermeticity of the package
Current
Thermosealed/ Thermoformed
with modified atmosphere
Thermosealed
Phormanto™
Time on the gondola (shelf life)*
Current
Thermosealed/ Thermoformed
with modified atmosphere
Thermosealed
Phormanto™
* The gondola time may be longer under certain conditions of temperature and conservation.
*All the results shared here are based on empirical data and may vary according to the quality of the product to be packaged, its manipulation, its transportation and storage according to the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Additionally, the results depend on the cleaning conditions of the thermoforming machine and its maintainance, according to the technical guide.
Dow, ULMA and partners may collaborate and participate in the development of all packages mentioned. The objective of this comparison is to make the industry think and analyze profoundly what makes sense in each case. If the product is not fresh chicken, bring your challenge to us and we will help solve it.